
The Shape of Things to Come: Don Taylor's article in the March
'02 issue of Going Forward, "The Round Table,"
has sparked interest in reexamining the Mensa logo in current usage.
On the electronic Editors List, a great deal of lively discussion has
been put forth regarding our logo and the Mensa "face" it
presents to ourselves and the world. Several members have produced their
own renditions of a Mensa logo. Tyger Gilbert, AMC Communications Officer,
offered to facilitate redesign efforts by walking a plan, when developed,
through appropriate channels.
On Report: Awards given to newsletters have long been a subject
of controversy. This issue of Going Forward touches upon the
topic. For a more in-depth history, go to Dick
Amyx's Mensa Pages and look for the "new"
posting regarding editors and awards.
Final Bell: The Mensa Constitution states (III.D.): "Members
having a dispute with Mensa, with any national Mensa or subdivision
thereof, or with another member arising out of Mensa-related activities
shall exhaust all avenues of settlement and redress within the Society
before taking the dispute to external authorities. Failure to do so
may be considered an act inimical to Mensa." The national Hearings
Committee unanimously held that Carole Bell did not exhaust
all avenues of settlement and redress within Mensa before taking her
dispute to external authorities and declared it an act inimical to
Mensa.
The Hearings Committee voted 2-1 to expel Carole from Mensa.
The majority of the Hearings Committee based its sanction on two things:
a) Bell did not appeal to the International Board of Directors (IBD)
to lift her suspension before she filed externally. Although Bell
was suspended at the time of the IBD meeting and could not make a
motion to lift her suspension, it was felt that she should/could have
asked an IBD member in good standing to make that motion for her;
and
b) Bell did not file charges of "acts inimical" with the
American Mensa Hearings Committee against Jean Becker and Dave Remine,
the two American members of the International Executive Committee
that suspended Bell. The majority of the Hearings Committee felt that
such filing of charges was an avenue of redress available internally
if Bell felt her suspension as international Membership Director was
illegal.
The dissenting vote on expulsion, that of Tony Jackowski, was based
on five points, including Mensa's lack of a published list of all
avenues available internally for problem resolution and the order
in which those avenues should be utilized, leaving a member in potential
violation of the Constitution simply by not knowing that a certain
form of redress exists. Jackowski also reminds us that the cost to
Mensa in attorney fees is irrelevant because that is not part
of the charge against Bell.
As of publication date, the AMC has not met to vote on the sanction
determined by the Hearings Committee. That vote will come on Saturday,
July 6.
Sundaze Redux: The last issue of Going Forward carried
an article about and brief history of AMC's violation of the ASIE
requiring that the Annual Business Meeting (ABM) be held on Sunday
morning during the AG. The agenda for the July 6th AMC
meeting includes a motion that will allow the day of the ABM to be
determined on an annual basis. This year's ABM will be held on Thursday,
July 4, two days before the AMC votes on the motion.
Previous Article
| Contents | Next Article
|