|  PRP 
          Awards: What Are We Recognizing?
        Mensa's newsletter award program is currently named the Publications Recognition 
        Program (PRP). It was started over 30 years ago under the name Editors' 
        Awards. The program's original intent hasn't changed very much over the 
        years, but the categories for which the awards are given and the number 
        of awards conferred have become an issue of much controversy. 
          
         I have been a PRP judge for the last three years. The program is strictly 
          voluntary. The Mensa Publications Officer assembles a group of volunteer 
          judges under the guidance of an appointed chairman. Editors are notified 
          during the first quarter of the calendar year that they may submit multiple 
          sets (depending on the number of judges) of three consecutive issues, 
          of their choosing, of their newsletters by the first of April. All newsletter 
          submissions must be accompanied by various paperwork in which the editors 
          and LocSecs certify that the newsletters' contents are original and 
          have been authored by their membership. Over a lengthy and time-consuming 
          process, the judges rate the content of the newsletters in many predetermined 
          categories. The individual ratings are tabulated by the PRP chair and 
          the awards are presented at the AG. 
          
         With the proliferation of computers coupled with the sophisticated 
          desktop publishing programs available, the computer-literate editor 
          can "turn out" a class publication with a lot less effort 
          than the editor of 10 years ago. Awards for style, blue pencil, overall 
          appearance, etc., no longer carry the meaning that they once did. It 
          is time to revamp the PRP to make it more meaningful to Mensa as an 
          organization. 
          
         Individual contributors can win awards in categories including fiction, 
          poetry, puzzles/games, art, humor, essay and a few more. The newsletters 
          themselves qualify for awards for membership, LocSec column, editorial, 
          photography and the previously mentioned blue pencil, style, etc. Missing 
          from the list of awards is an award on publishing anything to do with 
          Mensa, its ideals, purpose and/or goals. 
          
         It has been said that if a person who wasn't familiar with Mensa read 
          a typical Mensa newsletter, he would learn next to nothing about the 
          group. Most newsletters contain reprints of Internet jokes and a LocSec 
          column that is often nothing more than a travelogue or stories about 
          grandchildren, chocolate or cats. Many editors' columns are a rehash 
          of the current newsletter. The membership column is a listing of members' 
          birthdays and anniversaries. Poetry, fiction, essays, etc., have nothing 
          to do with Mensa but it is always gratifying to see members contributing 
          to their group's newsletter. 
          
         How about awards for the newsletter that fosters intelligence, is most 
          effective at member recruitment, promotes gifted children's activities 
          and, in general, promotes the ideals of Mensa? It is time to recognize 
          the intelligent side of Mensa rather than its social side. 
          
         John H. Garrison
  
          Previous Article 
            | Contents | Next 
            Article |